Feed on
Posts
Comments

An ASS of U n ME

Assumptions make war,
clarifications lead to peace.

~ if not now, when?, Chapter 03 Peace + Anger, Tsem Tulku Rinpoche

Tags: , ,

Do I Know You?

Do we really know people whom we think we know? Without our ideas or concepts of who they are, are they still who they are? Yet, whatever they portray to be, are they truly that?

Yesterday I was having a conversation with a loved one who revealed that he feels a certain attraction towards this person but was wise to discern that he does not know if he likes or loves this person until he really knows this person. The truth is, we can never really know another. And here in this case of this loved one and the one whom he is attracted to, is like that. They will go out on dates, much less spend time together, and he will begin to observe her, and she will begin to observe him too, discerning if they are right for each other. What I mean here ‘right for each other’ is to mean that if he could pick up qualities of her that resonates with him, or more so, what he thinks of himself at that moment, then he might grow to like her a little more concluding that she is like this and she is like that.. and if he likes what he is experiencing… always failing to notice that it is actually the very same qualities of himself that he likes in himself, he might conclude that she is the right one for him. And say, she displays qualities that he doesn’t like about himself, then he might jump into the conclusion that she is not the right one for him because he then decides that he doesn’t like her.

I’d say that the attraction is beyond our control as it just happens. Likes always attracts the likes. Someone posted me a question if it is the similar or the opposite that attracts. My take for the moment is that it is both. In truth, there are no opposites. Very much like how I admire a person, I am always admiring a person for a quality that I have within, but not yet discover or unravel due to many reasons; and how when I dislike someone, it is usually the qualities that I dislike about myself. Hence what seems opposite is actually the same underneath. My cousin was telling me how he is in love with this girl he is now dating because she is the total opposite of him, and he likes that otherwise he’d be dating a mirror! The truth is, he is dating his mirror – the part of him that he has yet to discover in him or rather, thought lacked in him. He hasn’t really realised that he is in fact, dating just himself.

Ponder on it, if we did not put a conclusion or a judgement on another – say, she is loving; then would it make any difference to you when one day, she behaves unlovingly? Most likely not, and she would be as she is – indefinable. Another example, she is wise – and during moments when you find her speaking or doing unwise things – then you might conclude she is not that wise after all and probably end up getting irritated with her for not being the wise person whom you had concluded her to be, for not living up to your expectations of how she is supposed to be, in your mind.

There is really not a personality to anyone, but yet that is what we do – we judge and conclude ourselves and others of a personality, totally disallowing ourselves and others to sway away from the ideas that we have of ourselves and others. Can you imagine how tiring and hard that must be for ourselves and others? The truth is that, we and others are living off or rather acting out fluctuating states of mind and what we experience majority of the time with this person is what we conclude this person to be. It is possible why couples tend to end up in arguments and dislike each other’s personalities when they spend too long a time together due to the fleeting states of mind, which is uncontrollable to them if they had not yet questioned their own behaviour, decisions much less others.

My dad used to tell me this ‘I love you, but that does not mean that I like you’ and I used to ponder on that. I came to realise that love itself, or whatever word you wish to call it is in truth unconditional as the bond doesn’t get threaten. But what happens is that when we start to place concepts on others or even ourselves (because we have to define ourselves in order to define others), and on top of that place other concepts around the bond or connection like the shoulds, should nots, must, must nots – expectations come into the relationship and hence when expectations are not met, war happens and that hurts. It hurts because it seems to threaten the bond between two or more people with ourselves.

And we find that, during momentary wars like these, two people need their space. Yet because of the concepts built around the relationship, the fear of losing the relationship, the fear of change in the relationship or more so the other person propels each other to consistently try to reach out to each other in a very inauthentic way when their own healing or calming process have not come to an end – often, as if an assurance to the other that hey, I am still here, and I still love you, so don’t leave me yet; or as an assurance to ourselves that yes, this person is still here with me… and I better hurry this process of anger or discomfort so that we can regain the experience of joy of being together again. But when I can’t seem to get out of it, I might want to manipulate the other to get the other to apologise so that I can come to peace again and in that peace, I can move confidently in the so-called relationship I have with this other person. The truth is that this doesn’t really work though it seems to for many couples. They sweep a part of themselves under the carpet so that they could go back to this person, or to the relationship; or they walk away from this person, or from the relationship concluding (again!) that this person is not right for them. Either way, it is a mode of running away and not taking responsibility.

If we could begin to understand that there is not really a personality in the first place except what is being played out for that moment, we will begin to understand that the other’s behaviour is simply a manifestation of a fleeting state of mind, although unconsciously.

The other person never changed, though it seemed like it. The other person is as it is, whatever she believes herself to be and whatever you believe her to be, at that precise moment. The other person, or as a matter of fact, you too, is indefinable.

So, you can recognise the state that the other person is in, but never truly know the other, until you have come to realise that personalities don’t really exist; until you have come to realise what is it that propels you to conclude a personality, which includes who you think you are.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cycles of “I”

I thought this
I thought that
because I assumed
I concluded.

I need to be sure
else I cannot function
so I first observe
I collect evidence
and then I conclude
an I-dea born
and act on it.

That becomes “I”
hard, immovable
stapled to the ground
the post erected.

Until… Wisdom visits.

In awareness.
In patience.
In willingness.
In forgiveness.

I breaks into segment of pieces.

Then there is no thinking.
No conclusion.
Just grace.

Until the segment left of pieces
if unclean, unattended
then collect themselves
data to support remnants
once again
to conclude
another I-dea(s) born.

And the whole cycle begins again.

I that concludes
broken again
to be erected again
and broken
once more
again.

Like the dreamer
who dreams
and then becomes
the dream catcher, himself.

I look for solidness
for proofs
Wisdom shatters what is frozen
and
has it flowing with nature
as nature
once again.

Hence even the conclusion
“I” am wise
too
will be crushed
just as
“I” am awakened
~ to be not awakened.

I
always, always
construing, constructing, finalising
and
Wisdom
incising
into what is I.

I
not you, not me, not her, not him.
I
simply a dear friend yet a foe
I
Ignorance.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Those who are sensitive often feel weak. Those who feel strong are often insensitive.

Some people are sensitive to themselves but insensitive to others . They often feel the others are “bad guys.”

Those who are sensitive to others but not to themselves often end up feeling Poor me.

Some conclude it’s better not to be sensitive, because sensitivity brings pain. They shut off. But mind you, if you are not sensitive, you will lose all the finer things in life too – intuition, beauty and ecstasy of love.

Insensitive people usually do not recognize their weakness .And those who are sensitive do not recognize that their sensitivity is their strength .

This path and this Knowledge make you strong and sensitive .

Sensitivity is intuition. Sensitivity is compassion. Sensitivity is love. Sensitivity is real strength: calmness, endurance, silence, non-reactiveness, confidence, faith and a smile.

Be both sensitive and strong.

~ Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

Tags: , , ,

What an ‘I’!!

Views, Views
Ideas, Ideas
How the world is run
How you and I are run

Am, Am Not
One
Is, Is Not
One

Happy, Sad
One
Wanting, Not Wanting
One

Opposites of the Same
One end of Polarity to the other end
What is there
Is? Is Not?
Am? Am Not?

What is the diff?

Am – happier
Am not – not so good
Which is truer?
Only truer,
still not true
when put on board.

Without views
Without ideas
Without thoughts
What is there?
Nothing
Until
The Believer believes
Or the Non-Believer don’t believe
Eh, the Non-Believer still has to believe that he does not believe, no?
Shucks!
What is the diff?
No diff.

Ahem… can I get out of here?

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The Midpoint

When one is misunderstood
Surely there is another that misunderstands
Hence the arising of the accused
Accompanying the birth of the plaintiff

Like one that is defined responsible
The emergence of the irresponsible
The rich & the poor
The beautiful & the ugly

Like extreme heat is actually coldness
Like extreme coldness is actually heat
As its opposite end
Brought back into one

What is there to argue
What is there to blame
When all in all is just a dance of its own
A dance of two in one

Nothing leaves the mind
Hence ending in the mind
When truth is revealed
Intimacy regains

One cannot regain control
When un-control is present
And balance cannot be restored
When control and un-control have not met

While many is perceived lost
Yet what is lost is always found
Found only in its midpoint
The balance of Love & Truth
Where and when the Lover & The Beloved meets.

Tags: , , , ,

Run By Perceptions

Everything here
run by perceptions
meanings

Onto self
onto others
materials
even
what is formless
not left out

That ‘thing’
which is not really a ‘thing’
but named a ‘thing’
separated out from wholeness
defined by ‘colors’
and intensity of its sub-origin
then named ‘a tree’
and it is ‘green’
and so on and so forth

Liken the nature of mind
attracting its own kind
its intensity
cannot be seen as it is
but defined
from comparison
from consequence
of other experiences
also defined

Like words, actions, views
all conjured and conditioned
by past learning and experiences
ancient, ancient ideas
that are somewhat difficult
though still possible
to shine light upon

How to meet
with meanings apart from each other
how to understand
if not to listen

Listening not to the words
but to the heart of the soul
where words only mean to direct
but not it
merely
pointing to what is,
too.

Tags: , , , ,

Returning to Peace

Peace is the closest word, if not the chosen word to the un-wavered state of non-movement and stillness. It is not really a feeling though it feels like it, so it would be wise not to conclude that when there are triggers, peace is gone or that there is no peace.

Peace is not something that is reinstated but just clouded for a while in the midst of mind’s turmoil and or rather, when we are identified with the turmoil. Hence the saying ‘be at peace with it’ is to mean that we no longer resist the mind’s turmoil and naturally become dis-identified with the turmoil hence joins with the state of peace with the mere acceptance of the situation.

So some people say that they are unable to accept the turmoil, then accept the non-acceptance of the turmoil hence coming back to join with the state of peace.

The reason why there are moments when there is peace and moments when we feel turmoil is because of the switch of mind states but does not necessarily mean that you are joined with the state of peace. It only means that we are where we are.

Yet, when there are moments when there is peace amidst the turmoil and moments when it is clearly the turmoil that is being experienced, is because awareness is unable to remain aware of the turmoil for a long period of time but joins with it once again, so to speak.

The reason why awareness joins with it is because awareness is not aware, as in the sustenance of the awake or aware state is not strong hence it goes back into not being aware, as it is said to be asleep.

Thus to remain awake is a constant effort though after a while, the effort of it becomes tense. Yet if awareness is aware of the ‘effort’ so to speak, it becomes awake again hence it is a consistent practice to the point of perfection that it remains aware all in all of its moment. It is like this, there is either a witnessing, or a total immersion.

Again, all are only words used. Any words that can be humanly defined are bound to be interpreted or misconstrued. Don’t believe me; continue the practice and you will see.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Silent Witness

Almost every ego contains at least an element of what we might call “victim identity”. Some people have such a strong victim of themselves that it becomes the central core of their ego. Resentment and grievances form an essential part of their sense of self.

Even if your grievances are completely “justified,” you have constructed an identify for yourself that is much like a prison whose bars are made of thought forms. See what you are doing to yourself, or rather what your mind is doing to you. Feel the emotional attachment you have to your victim story and become aware of the compulson to think or talk about it. Be there as the witnessing presence of your inner state. You don’t have to do anything. With awareness comes transformation and freedom.

– Stillness Speaks, The Egoic Self, Eckhart Tolle

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Losing Idols

When J says to lose idols, he did not mean to stop having or cease to have for that is beyond control; but to realize that idols are not what fulfils and is not what you truly want. What he meant was to lose the middleman, and to start here with yourself – acknowledging what you have always wanted is here, within you, now.

Idols are made out of ideas, concepts from a space of which you think you lack – and idols, while their functions are not for what you think it is for – are merely nothing, including that of which you think you are. The you that He refers to is not you as the body but as who you truly are; which is beyond this body hence the body, as in your body of which you think you are, including of your ideas, views and identity too, are not excluded in the category of idols.

His meaning of losing idols, is not to mean ‘leave’ or to ‘give up’ anyone or anything but to leave, give up and dissolve the meaning of what you put onto yourself, your brothers and sisters, an experience, a situation, a material or circumstance as they are all void of the essence that could ever complete you, amidst their already pronounced function. And to define them to suit the needs of which you think would fit the bill is to tell the Creator you are in charge and that you know best.

If it is true that you know best then why would you weep when idols fail you? For you must surely know by now that what you want is what you get. Perhaps you know what you want but thought otherwise hence the suffering of the confused mind, not aligned with what is it that is willed.

Seek within is to mean that what you are seeking for is already yours, and what would compel that you seek outwards is but the belief that you do not have it and thus rely on idols to bring you what you thought you needed or did not have. It is either you have amnesia or lack the courage to truly give yourself what you want, thus finding a scapegoat of which you would call an idol to strip you off what you already have and yet thought it was not there. Here still, you do not realise that no one can take away from you what is forever yours and is only yours to claim. Claim too, is a wrong word to use as it means that it was once lost. It was never lost, but unseen and what is unseen is not and never lost, only temporarily forgotten in innocence; to be reminded again.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »